CFPA's Program Access Index (PAI) estimates CalFresh utilization among
low-income individuals in each of California's 58 counties.
For more on CalFresh, visit our
CalFresh page.
County-specific press releases are available here:
Meauring County CalFresh Performance in 2010: The Program Access Index PDF
Please note that the methodology used to generate the 2010 Program Access Index (PAI) differs from the methodology used in years past. This adjustment was necessary due to a change in available data sources. For full details, please see the Methodology section of the full report.
Tables showing the PAI for all California counties are available below.
The PAI estimates CalFresh utilization among low-income individuals. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) produces an annual state-level PAI. The PAI provided on this page is a county-level analysis modeled on the USDA methodology. As shown in the general formula below, the county-level PAI estimates CalFresh utilization among individuals who meet three eligibility criteria:
The PAI incorporates only three CalFresh eligibility criteria. Therefore, it is not a participation rate that measure CalFresh utilization among fully-eligible individuals. However, the PAI can help illuminate county-level differences in CalFresh administration and utilization.
Each year, USDA releases SNAP/CalFresh participation rates for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. These participation rates are complex estimates of SNAP/CalFresh utilization among eligible individuals. The rates take into account several criteria for food stamp eligibility, including income, household resources, receipt of SSI, and citizenship/immigration status.4 In comparison, the PAI takes into account three CalFresh criteria: income, FDPIR participation, and SSI status.
State participation rates for any given year are typically released two years following. In comparison, the PAI can be calculated within one year.
USDA state participation rates may be the best available estimates of CalFresh utilization among fully-eligible individuals. However, the rates are calculated as statewide measures and have limited relevance at the county level. USDA does not calculate county-level participation rates. Because CalFresh policies and practices vary across California counties, a county-level indicator of utilization and administrative performance is necessary. The PAI is one such indicator.
The PAI can be used to draw comparisons of CalFresh performance between counties and between counties and the state. The tables below include county rankings. The county ranked number one has the highest estimated CalFresh utilization relative to the total number of income-eligible individuals who do not participate in FDPIR or receive SSI.
The county-level PAI is not designed to establish trends of county performance or CalFresh utilization over time. There are two primary challenges with using the PAI in this manner:
The tables below show the PAI for all 58 California counties and include county rankings. The number-one-ranked county has the highest CalFresh utilization relative to the total number of income-eligible individuals who do not participate in FDPIR or receive SSI.5
Table 1 lists the counties alphabetically. Table 2 lists the counties by PAI rank.
Printable version of Tables 1 and 2 PDF
Table notes 1-2: The PAI is listed here with three significant digits. However, the PAI used to calculate the county ranking contained 15 significant digits. Viewed with four significant digits, San Bernardino County’s PAI is 0.6593 and Lassen County's PAI is 0.6950. Thus, their respective ranks are 8 and 9. Similarly, Nevada County’s PAI is 0.3804 and San Francisco County’s PAI is 0.3795.
_______________________